Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Sites | Writers | Advertise | My Orble | Login

Would You Eat Your Pet if You Were in the Middle of Nowhere and You had no Other Means of Survival?

August 21st 2008 21:00


Photo by Aixeneta. Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons.


This post came about after a comment fellow blogger Sara Dobson wrote on one of my posts:

Sara Dobson's comment


That had me thinking. As Sara points out, if a human being was stuck in the middle of nowhere and was starving and ate their pet, no one would blink an eyelid. Same goes for euthanasia. Each day countless of companion animals are put to sleep as veterinarians think they are in too much pain to continue living or because animal shelters are overcrowded. This seldom makes the news but whenever humans practise euthanasia on themselves or someone else, immediately there’s an outcry of murder. It seems an animal’s life is not as valuable as a human being’s.

So back to my hypothetic scenario. Would you do it? Could you do it? I certainly wouldn’t and couldn’t. The thought of being stuck in Death Valley with Butterscotch, my favourite Tonkinese cat and then killing him and eating his raw flesh…ugh! But then who knows what humans are capable of when stuck in a desperate situation. Just look at the man who amputated his own arm so he could escape after it had been crushed against an 800 pound boulder. Sitting from my computer in a nice air conditioned office it’s easy for me to say, no I couldn’t do this but unless I am placed in the same situation, how do I really know for sure?

67
Vote
Shared on


   
Subscribe to this blog 


Just this blog This blog and DailyOrble (recommended)

   

   

   


Comments
10 Comments. [ Add A Comment ]

Comment by Kleonaptra

August 21st 2008 22:55
Yes, I see your point on perspective, but there is no way, NO WAY. The thought would not enter my mind. And you have to think as well, in the case of a carnivore like a dog or cat their flesh can be toxic to us, particularly if its raw.

What you say about humans is true. We are capable of extraordinary things, but to me, if you are riding your horse and end up lost and starving, its a cop out - and counter productive - to eat the horse. You need him to get out again, and he's easier to feed than you are. For gods sake, cut yourself a piece of flint, use that human ingenuity and catch a rabbitt!

Comment by Queenie

August 21st 2008 23:02
Actually, Kleonaptra, I'm quite squeamish when it comes to food so I'm more likely to munch on plants to survive as opposed to eating any animal.

I'm interested in your comment about cat/dog flesh being toxic to humans. How can that be? Please let me know. Thanks.

Comment by Aimzster

August 22nd 2008 05:28
I think my dog Sabre would eat me first. As happy as he is when he's wagging his tail, his tongue lolling out and his eyes shining when he sees me, I think at times he does it because he thinks I'd make a great dinner. But seriously, unless I'm put into that situation, I can't be certain. I'd like to think that, like you, I'd find other means to nourish myself but you never know, right?

Comment by Queenie

August 22nd 2008 06:21
Aimzster, I'm with you on that one. Thanks for stopping by!

Comment by Mr Nice Guy

August 22nd 2008 07:29
Would I eat my pet?

Probably not. If it was a pack animal - or something I had no affinity with or for - the answer would be completely different.

But human conscience being what it is sometimes - I would say if my dog had shown me that much loyality - I would probably return the loyality.

Now if it came down to my saving my family or eating the pet - then my family would come first.

Interesting question.

Comment by Mountain Fog

August 22nd 2008 10:51
Hmm.. well, no way of course! I could NEVER eat Stella pugface person, ever!

I would rather slowly die along side of her actually, and I can say that without equivocation.

However, on a similar vein, do you remember the Seoul (1988) Olympics? They love 'hot dogs' in Korea! However, due to the attendance of the international community, they had to make some quick changes to their menu, just as China has recently done;

(New York Times)
It’s Too Hot for Dog on the Menu
By FUCHSIA DUNLOP
Published: August 4, 2008

Quote:
THOSE who hope to taste dog meat when they visit Beijing for this summer’s Olympics may be disappointed. The Beijing Catering Trade Association has ordered all 112 designated Olympic restaurants to take dog off the menu, and has strongly advised other establishments to stop serving it until September. Waiters have been urged to “patiently” suggest alternative dishes to customers who ask for dog. It’s all part of a wider campaign to avoid offending foreigners during the Games. (Beijingers have also been told to line up nicely, to stop spitting and even to avoid asking tourists questions about their ages, salaries and love lives.)
Unquote

I wonder, was it originally just a bad translation thing, watching all those Hollywood movies, seeing people munching on hot dogs at the baseball?

The last word, for the argument, in opposing the vile practise of dog eating surely is this;

("The Star Online" Lifestyle) full article here
Appetite for dog meat
By MAJORIE CHIEW

(yes, that is her real name!)

extract: Quote:
Farmed dogs endure short, cramped, miserable lives. Brutal death awaits them. Many are said to be tortured or bled to death slowly. This results in adrenaline-rich meat which, according to folklore, makes men who eat it more virile.
Unquote

cheers...burrrp!

fog







Comment by Kleonaptra

August 23rd 2008 04:12
You'd be likely to survive with that philosophy Queenie, we are able to process most plant life.

Fog has touched on it here -
This results in adrenaline-rich meat

Of course, Fog is also referring to the terror of the animal...When an animal dies in fear and pain the meat actually turns purple from the stress. The flesh of carnivores is denser and thicker than that of prey animals, and its incredibly hard for a human stomach to process it. I might have been hasty to use the word 'toxic' but it will definitely make most people really ill. In terms of survival, you are more likely to survive just because you say you would test out the plant life, and by watching carefully you can easly figure whats edible and whats not. Also if you have your appendix - I still do - your system can be retrained to survive on literal garbage.

But those who decide to eat something that eats other animals and nothing else are bound to get very sick from it - its actually safer to eat a human!

Comment by Sara Dobson

August 23rd 2008 07:43
I think in our rich society we don't understand what it means to be truely starving. But I would think it would drive you insane and the human instinct to survive would take over.
It would probably be a fight between yours and your pets instinct to survive, so it depends on who gets to who first.

Comment by Queenie

August 24th 2008 00:52
Mr Nice Guy - interesting post. The question comes down to where do you draw the line?

Mountain Fog - Yes, I did read about Beijing temporarily banning dog during the Olym[pics. I asked my Chinese collegaue how widespread dog eating is in China and she says it's restricted to rural areas. This is what I have heard from other Chinese people as well so I wonder about how common it is in Beijing.

As for Marjorie Chew's quote, I think the same could be applied to a lot of animals Westerners think are okay to eat. You only need to look at chicken farms to see chickens aren't exactly raised in the best conditions either.

Kleonaptra - thanks for answering my question. I didn't know that.

Sara - that's also true too.

Thank you all for visiting!

Comment by Mountain Fog

August 24th 2008 03:10
Hi Queenie,
yes I agree, intensive farming of any animal is abhorrent, and the plight of poor pigs especially. My niece put me onto this sad fact, and I ended up joining the action group and, of course, not eating caged pig meat or chicken whenever choice is possible.

There needs to be a global awakening and education about intensive farming, which is not for the animals' benefit, as the liars representing the 'ag' industry would have everyone believe, but just for a bigger profit.

cheers

fog

Add A Comment

To create a fully formatted comment please click here.


CLICK HERE TO LOGIN | CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Name or Orble Tag
Home Page (optional)
Comments
Bold Italic Underline Strikethrough Separator Left Center Right Separator Quote Insert Link Insert Email
Notify me of replies
Notify extra people about this comment
Is this a private comment?
List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this comment


One per line max of 30

List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this private comment thread. Only the people in this list will be able to see or reply to your comment.


One per line max of 30

Your Name
(for the email going out to the above list, it can be different to your Orble Tag)
Your Email Address
(optional)
(required for reply notification)
Submit
More Posts
1 Posts
22 Posts
23 Posts
324 Posts dating from January 2007
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
0
Moderated by Queenie
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]